The building boom fueled by both UI construction as well as ICCSD projects, certainly will have both positive and negative consequences. Maximizing the former and minimizing the latter is the key for leaders of both municipal governments and other agencies. I'm glad there is cooperation and discussion happening throughout the Iowa City-Cedar Rapids corridor. As I mentioned in How Hospitals Affect University Heights we are very much in the middle of everything.
Thoughts on how to keep University Heights vibrant and viable now and in the future. Started as individual posts from a group of candidates in the 2011 city election, it continues now as a forum for civic discussion.
Thursday, December 19, 2013
The Boom Around Us
I found the link below last night and it is a succinct summary of what I've been thinking about as I watch the area skyline:
Wednesday, December 11, 2013
December Council Meeting Summary
City Council held their final meeting of 2013 last night, here are some highlights:
Outgoing Councilors Recognized
With last night being the final council meeting of their terms, Rosanne Hopson, Jan Leff and Brennan McGrath were recognized with plaques commemorating their service and cake. I hope you will extend your thanks to each of them for their efforts on behalf of our community.Severson Charity Challenge
University Heights is working to retain possession of the Severson Cup, awarded to the Johnson County municipality with the highest per capita donations to local charities. For more information on the contest, and how you can participate, please check Mayor Louise From's December 2013 ReportWinter Weather Reminders
Please remember that according to City Ordinance 82:No owner, tenant, or other person in possession or control of property shall allow natural accumulations of snow or ice to remain upon abutting sidewalks for more than twenty-four (24) hours. U-Heights Snow removal information/regulations
To read more about last night's meeting here is the agenda and attached documents.
Also some other good news to pass along:

Councilor Elect Zadok Nampala, and his wife, Erin Schmidt, welcomed their daughter, Zada Elizabeth Nampala, born November 26th. She joins older brother and sister Tai and Amaya.
Labels:
2013 Council Summary,
Celebration,
Wide sidewalk,
Zadok
Wednesday, November 13, 2013
November Council Meeting Summary
City Council held their regular November meeting last night. Here are some highlights:
Download the complete
agenda and attachments
Additional Leaf Vacuum Pick Up 11-21-13
One More Time: Council was able to approve an additional leaf vacuum pickup on Nov. 21. Please rake leaves to the curb as usual. Free leaf bag pick up will be moved back to Nov. 25/26.New Snow Removal Contract
Get Ready for Winter: Council discussed selecting a new contractor to award the 2013-14 snow removal contact. Council will likely make final selection at a special meeting next week. Johnson County Refuse is retiring from snow removal only. They will continue to handle our refuse, recycling and leaf/Christmas tree collection.Lowered Speed Limit on Prospect
10 MPH on dead end street: Council approved a new speed limit for Prospect Place, this is a short dead end that has an uphill.There are no sidewalks on this street and quite a few small children.Download the complete
agenda and attachments
Thursday, November 7, 2013
Thank YOU!
It is with a deep sense of gratitude that I say thanks to the voters
of University Heights. To have a turnout that is triple the county
average is amazing.
Top 5 finishers elected to council
When talking to the Press Citizen Tuesday night I was hoping to express that it is imperative for the new council to work to bring our community back together. It will take effort from all parties to do so.
Pro-development sweeps U. Heights
City Council
|
Early Vote
|
Nov. 5TH
|
Total
|
Percent
|
Haverkamp
|
133
|
221
|
354
|
63%
|
Lane
|
129
|
205
|
334
|
60%
|
Quezada
|
126
|
198
|
324
|
58%
|
Miller
|
121
|
175
|
296
|
53%
|
Nampala
|
118
|
165
|
283
|
51%
|
McGrath
|
123
|
134
|
257
|
46%
|
Hopson
|
120
|
122
|
242
|
43%
|
Leff
|
116
|
125
|
241
|
43%
|
Stewart
|
116
|
104
|
220
|
39%
|
Write Ins
|
4
|
9
|
13
|
Top 5 finishers elected to council
MAYOR
|
Early Vote
|
Nov. 5TH
|
Total
|
Percent
|
From
|
151
|
205
|
356
|
90%
|
Write Ins
|
26
|
15
|
41
|
Total Voters
|
Early Vote
|
Nov. 5TH
|
Total
|
242
|
317
|
559
|
When talking to the Press Citizen Tuesday night I was hoping to express that it is imperative for the new council to work to bring our community back together. It will take effort from all parties to do so.
Pro-development sweeps U. Heights
60.3 percent of registered voters cast a ballot,
which set a city record and led county in turnout
Voters turned out in record numbers Tuesday in University Heights, delivering a resounding pro-development message.
With 60 percent of registered voters casting a ballot, residents ousted the three City Council members who have stood in opposition of a developer’s plans to construct the mixed-use project along Melrose Avenue called One University Place.
Incumbents Rosanne Hopson, Jan Leff and Brennan McGrath — who have fought the proposed commercial and condominium project that has been at the center of bitter debate the past five years — each lost their seats. They will be replaced by Virginia Miller,Zadok Nampala and Silvia Quezada, a trio of first-time challengers who ran on pro-development platforms.
“I’m really looking forward to working together with the rest of the group and finally having a green light for the development going forward, the way people in University Heights want to see it,” said Nampala, a 30-year-old master’s student in social work at the University of Iowa.
Pro-development incumbents Mike Haverkamp and Jim Lane retained their council posts with the top two showings, garnering 63 percent and 60 percent, unofficially.
In total, 559 of University Heights’ 927 registered voters cast a ballot, or 60.3 percent. It was by far the highest percentage of any city in Johnson County, and set a new city record for turnout, surpassing the previous high mark of 534 voters in 2011.
Although past elections amid the One University Place debate have been decided by razor-thin margins and resulted in councils with clashing development philosophies, the coalition of pro-development candidates ran away with the race this time around.
Still, rather than touting victory, Haverkamp and others stressed moving on from the contentious and sometimes ugly debates of the past few years and bringing people back together.
“The thing to always remember is we’re a small town where we know everybody, so I think what’s important is to remember the entire community functioning together is the only way we’re going to move forward,” said Haverkamp, a 53-year-old teacher. “I think the responsibility the citizens of our community have entrusted us with is something I take very seriously, and I’ll make sure I’m responsible to everyone in the community.”
Lane, a 68-year-old investment consultant, said the pro-development camp presented “a positive vision” that resonated with voters. However, he said much of the heavy lifting lies ahead, particularity the looming question of how much financial support the city will contribute to One University Place.
“Quite frankly, the work is just beginning,” Lane said. “We have to figure out the right development, especially the financing. I don’t want to see the community get financially strapped.”
Quezada, a 39-year-old attorney, said that even though Tuesday’s five victors campaigned as a “loose coalition,” they each will bring distinct approaches to the council in how they’d like to see the development take shape.
“I think the voters are ready for smart, intelligent growth in our community, and I’m ready to do the people’s business and protect our best interest going forward and setting us up for a bright and fulfilling future in University Heights,” Quezada said.
Miller said that with St. Andrew Presbyterian Church set to finalize the sale of the property to the developer and relocate in the coming years, she’s eager to help University Heights “start trying to move forward.”
“We now have a pretty firm time line of when the church is moving out that we can work around, so there are not as many unknowns as there were in the past,” said Miller, a 31-year-old stay-at-home mother.
Mayor Louise From, who ran uncontested, will serve a fifth term as mayor after collecting 90 percent of the votes.
With 60 percent of registered voters casting a ballot, residents ousted the three City Council members who have stood in opposition of a developer’s plans to construct the mixed-use project along Melrose Avenue called One University Place.
Incumbents Rosanne Hopson, Jan Leff and Brennan McGrath — who have fought the proposed commercial and condominium project that has been at the center of bitter debate the past five years — each lost their seats. They will be replaced by Virginia Miller,Zadok Nampala and Silvia Quezada, a trio of first-time challengers who ran on pro-development platforms.
“I’m really looking forward to working together with the rest of the group and finally having a green light for the development going forward, the way people in University Heights want to see it,” said Nampala, a 30-year-old master’s student in social work at the University of Iowa.
Pro-development incumbents Mike Haverkamp and Jim Lane retained their council posts with the top two showings, garnering 63 percent and 60 percent, unofficially.
In total, 559 of University Heights’ 927 registered voters cast a ballot, or 60.3 percent. It was by far the highest percentage of any city in Johnson County, and set a new city record for turnout, surpassing the previous high mark of 534 voters in 2011.
Although past elections amid the One University Place debate have been decided by razor-thin margins and resulted in councils with clashing development philosophies, the coalition of pro-development candidates ran away with the race this time around.
Still, rather than touting victory, Haverkamp and others stressed moving on from the contentious and sometimes ugly debates of the past few years and bringing people back together.
“The thing to always remember is we’re a small town where we know everybody, so I think what’s important is to remember the entire community functioning together is the only way we’re going to move forward,” said Haverkamp, a 53-year-old teacher. “I think the responsibility the citizens of our community have entrusted us with is something I take very seriously, and I’ll make sure I’m responsible to everyone in the community.”
Lane, a 68-year-old investment consultant, said the pro-development camp presented “a positive vision” that resonated with voters. However, he said much of the heavy lifting lies ahead, particularity the looming question of how much financial support the city will contribute to One University Place.
“Quite frankly, the work is just beginning,” Lane said. “We have to figure out the right development, especially the financing. I don’t want to see the community get financially strapped.”
Quezada, a 39-year-old attorney, said that even though Tuesday’s five victors campaigned as a “loose coalition,” they each will bring distinct approaches to the council in how they’d like to see the development take shape.
“I think the voters are ready for smart, intelligent growth in our community, and I’m ready to do the people’s business and protect our best interest going forward and setting us up for a bright and fulfilling future in University Heights,” Quezada said.
Miller said that with St. Andrew Presbyterian Church set to finalize the sale of the property to the developer and relocate in the coming years, she’s eager to help University Heights “start trying to move forward.”
“We now have a pretty firm time line of when the church is moving out that we can work around, so there are not as many unknowns as there were in the past,” said Miller, a 31-year-old stay-at-home mother.
Mayor Louise From, who ran uncontested, will serve a fifth term as mayor after collecting 90 percent of the votes.
Labels:
2013 Election,
Jim,
Louise,
Mike,
One University Place,
Silvia,
Virginia,
Zadok
Tuesday, November 5, 2013
YOUR TURN!
It's Election Day! Turnout this morning has already been brisk.
By 9:00 AM 51 people (5%) of registered voters had voted today
By 11:00 AM 94 people (10%) of registered voters had voted today
In early/absentee voting 250 ballots were cast
By 9:00 AM 51 people (5%) of registered voters had voted today
By 11:00 AM 94 people (10%) of registered voters had voted today
In early/absentee voting 250 ballots were cast
POLLS OPEN UNTIL 8:00 PM
ST. ANDREW CHURCH
1300 MELROSE
Monday, November 4, 2013
Thanks to All of You
As I wrapped up door knocking yesterday I was struck again by how much I enjoy living in University Heights. The fact that people will answer their door to talk and ask questions is such a joy. I am truly grateful.
-Mike
-Mike
Friday, November 1, 2013
How Hospitals affect University Heights
While door knocking I was speaking with a new neighbor last week when he casually dropped the fact that the new UI Children's Hospital was looking to probably hire an ADDITIONAL 100 positions when it opens, projected for March of 2016. (I've been unable to find independent verification) I had no idea that the goal of the hospital project was to increase the size of the department so dramatically. I've been mulling that over for the past week and have thought a lot about the implications that may have for our town.
The increase in the size of the building is also dramatic. With 12 stories projected above ground, and two levels below ground, (and PARKING even below that) the building will be a prominent feature of the west side landscape.
University Heights was developed immediately after the opening of the original portion of University Hospital in 1924. An advertising piece that I have from the period states touts that homes would be located "only 5 or 6 blocks from the New Hospital." It also goes on to say. "A lot in University Heights is a safe investment because the
$6,000,000 building program of the UNIVERSITY on the West Side will
make a big demand for West Side property and will cause values to
increase very rapidly.” Their next statement is, “In a few
years we predict the West Side Campus of the University will be larger
than the East Side, and this will develop a residence section on the
West Side of the river as large as we now have on the East Side---a
business district with hotels, stores, etc. Iowa City will grow and
develop as the University develops… A future vision of Iowa City must be
a vision of a New City on the West Side.” At another portion of the brochure is the statement, “University Heights has ample building restriction sufficient to protect all parties. A business district has been planned.”
When our home was built you could see the University Hospitals from the front porch:
Another piece of history I thought of is University Heights' historian Pat Yeggy's article about the building of the Grandview Apartments in 1950. This project was initiated due to a critical need for housing for the estimated 600 families that would be moving to the Iowa City area for the new Veteran's Hospital which was at that time under construction. There was opposition to that project too, which sounds a bit familiar today. Read the MINUTES of JAN. 18 & 30, 1950 COUNCIL MEETINGS.
So it seems that the timing of the potential One University Place would be fortuitous for the next round of Hospital expansion, as other major U-Heights development has been in the past.
The increase in the size of the building is also dramatic. With 12 stories projected above ground, and two levels below ground, (and PARKING even below that) the building will be a prominent feature of the west side landscape.
image courtesy of http://www.uichildrens.org/ |
When our home was built you could see the University Hospitals from the front porch:
Another piece of history I thought of is University Heights' historian Pat Yeggy's article about the building of the Grandview Apartments in 1950. This project was initiated due to a critical need for housing for the estimated 600 families that would be moving to the Iowa City area for the new Veteran's Hospital which was at that time under construction. There was opposition to that project too, which sounds a bit familiar today. Read the MINUTES of JAN. 18 & 30, 1950 COUNCIL MEETINGS.
So it seems that the timing of the potential One University Place would be fortuitous for the next round of Hospital expansion, as other major U-Heights development has been in the past.
Labels:
community,
Smart Growth,
Time Machine,
walking
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)