As I mentioned back in a post in December, Louise From was recognized at her final council meeting for her service to University Heights. Cable Channel 4 in Iowa City is now streaming that meeting. It's worth watching
Thoughts on how to keep University Heights vibrant and viable now and in the future. Started as individual posts from a group of candidates in the 2011 city election, it continues now as a forum for civic discussion.
Showing posts with label 2015 City Council. Show all posts
Showing posts with label 2015 City Council. Show all posts
Wednesday, March 9, 2016
Council Meeting Webstream
Tuesday, December 15, 2015
A Very Sincere Thank You!
Mayor Louise From presided over her final meeting as mayor tonight and I'd like to say she was sent out in style. Completely unknown to her, various Iowa elected officials and a notable celebrity were asked to submit a letter of thanks to Louise. These were read at the meeting. She received congratulations and thanks from both U.S. Senators, Chuck Grassley and Joni Ernst, and our U.S. Rep. Dave Loebsack. She also received recognition from Governor Branstad, and our state senator, Joe Bolkcom. Our Iowa House rep, Mary Mascher, came in person to thank Louise also. The highlight of the presentation was a letter from Kirk Ferentz, who spoke of how University Heights was his first home in Iowa, and thanking Louise for her service.
Louise was elected to five terms as Mayor, for a total of 10 years. Prior to that she served six terms on council for 12 years. In total she served the City of University Heights for 22 years from January of 1994 through December of 2015. While I don't know Louise's exact age I'm pretty confident in thinking that she has served University Heights for at least one-third of her life.
I have greatly enjoyed working with Louise, and have great admiration for her abilities and the accomplishments she has made for the betterment of our city. I hope that if you see her in the coming days and weeks, that you'll tell her thank you too.
I have greatly enjoyed working with Louise, and have great admiration for her abilities and the accomplishments she has made for the betterment of our city. I hope that if you see her in the coming days and weeks, that you'll tell her thank you too.
Thursday, November 19, 2015
11/10/15 City Council Meeting Webstream
I should remember to post these regularly, because our friends at City Cable Channel 4 do a great job of making available a webstream of all regular City Council meetings. You can also watch a rebroadcast on Channel 4 every Thursday night at 9:00 PM.
Thursday, November 12, 2015
November Council Meeting Update
|
|||
|
|||
| |||
Labels:
2015 City Council,
community,
One University Place
Monday, October 19, 2015
October 2015 Council Meeting Summary
| |||
| |||
| |||
Thursday, September 10, 2015
September Council Meeting Summary
| ||||
| ||||
| ||||
Tuesday, August 11, 2015
One University Place Approvals
At our City Council meeting tonight Council voted 4-1 (Quezada voting "no") to approve the TIF Development Agreement which essentially approves the One University Place project. While this is nearly the culmination of 7 years work on planning this project, it is truly the beginning of the project itself.
Unlike most times, tonight I had a prepared statement to make regarding the vote. However the way our discussion went, I never had a chance to deliver it. So here are my thoughts on why I voted to approve the TIF :
Unlike most times, tonight I had a prepared statement to make regarding the vote. However the way our discussion went, I never had a chance to deliver it. So here are my thoughts on why I voted to approve the TIF :
As I consider tonight’s vote I want to reflect the journey
that has gotten us here. When I was first elected in 2009, my hope was the
U-Heights would be a financially secure community that maintained its high
quality of life. Approving this project, and the TIF that will make it happen
is a major step toward realizing that goal.
What I think is important to remember here is that the City
is not a part of the purchase process for this property. This development is
located on private land owned by St. Andrew Church. Unlike River Landing in
Coralville, or Plaza Towers in downtown Iowa City, we as a City do not own this
site, we could not solicit bids and choose a developer from among competing
projects.
Despite this, the residents of this community have molded
this project over the past 7 years and their ideas have resulted in
improvements and enhanced amenities. We will have commercial enterprises that
will add to our community. We will have a community center, at an attractive
price, where we can gather and celebrate. There will be playground space and
attractive outdoor facilities. The ravine east of the project will be preserved
in its current state. We will have an improved arterial intersection with
better traffic flow than we have currently. Those traffic improvements will be
paid by the project itself.
I don’t think anyone on council believes that Tax Increment
Financing is to be given away lightly or surreptitiously. We have received
advice from the National Development Council as to the need and amount of gap
financing. Without a TIF, this project does not proceed. While a gap of $4 million dollars, which
results over time in a $6.7 million rebate payout is certainly not small, it is
a reasonable amount, and the city will be able to repay without putting the
city or its residents at a financial risk.
This TIF we are considering complies with the guidelines set
forth by Peter Fisher of the Iowa Policy Institute for responsible use. Only
taxes collected on property in this development will be used to rebate costs.
Dr. Fisher advised not including the cost of a community center in the TIF
because we shouldn’t TIF for non-tax generating space. We are following that
recommendation.
Because I certainly know that tonight’s vote is not the end
but the beginning of the next chapter in the future of U-Heights, and I know
that approving this project will make us a financially secure community that
maintains its high quality of life I
will be voting yes.
Here is the link to more information about the project.
Labels:
2015 City Council,
community,
One University Place,
TIF
Tuesday, July 14, 2015
TIF Plan Details and My Opinions
RAGBRAI WATCH AND WAVE IS JULY 25th
incorrect date in my eMail!
With tonight’s approval of the TIF district and first approval of an ordinance identifying the district, City Council continues to move forward in the process to finalize and approve the One University Place development.
incorrect date in my eMail!
With tonight’s approval of the TIF district and first approval of an ordinance identifying the district, City Council continues to move forward in the process to finalize and approve the One University Place development.
I think it is fair to say there has been a lot of
misinformation about the project and the process of approving the TIF (tax
increment financing) that goes along with it. In order to help explain what is
happening I created a PowerPoint slideshow that I shared with the rest of
council and the public at tonight’s council meeting. That PowerPoint can be found here.
Key information points from
the PowerPoint:
- Only the area of project itself is in the TIF District. Taxes collected on those properties, AFTER protected levies are paid to all entities, will be used to rebate the developer for construction costs.
- All the major governmental entities (ICCSD, Johnson County, Kirkwood CC) will receive protected levies AND any leftover increment during the TIF.
- With a very conservative 1.5% annual increase in valuation (last 10 years U-H has averaged a 5.5% annual valuation increase) TIF would be paid off in 13.5 years.
- The Council is following recommendations from noted TIF critic, Peter Fisher, including bonding for the city community space rather than paying via TIF.
And here is my personal opinion based on the above:
TIF is
justified as it will ensure that the project is built as a high quality
residential/commercial development.
The inescapable
conclusion that I draw as I look over the long road we have taken to get to
this point is this:
The Council and
its staff have attained nearly every major concession or goal regarding the
project that represents what a majority of University Heights seems to want.
The City has repeatedly bent the developer to our will:
- The development is of a size that does not overwhelm the site or neighborhood
- The development includes commercial space that is desirable to many residents
- The development will have higher end residential space that will not be targeted to students
- The development will have a community center space at an attractive price
- The Melrose/Sunset intersection will be re-aligned at One University Place's expense
- The ravine east of the project will be protected in its current state
Labels:
2015 City Council,
One University Place,
St. Andrew,
TIF
Thursday, June 11, 2015
The Truth about TIF and the NDC
One of the most unfortunate aspects of the events leading up to our June city council meeting was the guest editorial by Silvia Quezada that ran in the Press Citizen Tuesday morning. Tom Jackson, Director of the NDC, sent an email to all of City Council Tuesday afternoon.
Silvia did start the meeting Tuesday night with an apology to Tom and the NDC. However since approximately 40 members of the public were at the meeting and I'm sure more than that read her editorial, I think it is fair to run his response here.
Silvia did start the meeting Tuesday night with an apology to Tom and the NDC. However since approximately 40 members of the public were at the meeting and I'm sure more than that read her editorial, I think it is fair to run his response here.
| ||||||||||||
|
Labels:
2015 City Council,
One University Place,
TIF
Wednesday, June 10, 2015
My Vote on One University Place
I voted in favor of the PUD and the Developer's Agreement at our June City Council meeting tonight. Neither decision was taken lightly nor without considering the many details of both documents. I also considered how those documents work in light of the request for TIF that the developer has made.
I have spoken at length lately about the merits of commercial development, how a rebate TIF is a best way to make sure this project succeeds, and why this project is good for our town. Tonight it is time for me to go back and reflect on what started me on this path 6 years ago.
When I first ran for council in November 2009 I spoke at length about our city budget and my concern over it. The fiscal year that had ended in June 2009 had a $39K annual deficit. I had spoken in favor of the proposed development as a citizen who saw walkable commercial as important to maintaining our town's quality of life. The more I studied the situation the more I realized that the economic impact was critical as well.
Even though the development has not progressed, we as a city received a reprieve in the form of the Local Option Sales Tax (LOST) that was collected in Johnson County from July 2009 through June 2013. We received roughly the equivalent of a 10% increase for those four years. We managed to bank quite a bit of those proceeds, even though our annual carryover was always smaller than the amount of LOST received. In conversations with Finance chair Jim Lane and City accountant Steve Kuhl 100% of the City's current carryover is attributable to LOST.
It is time to move this project forward. We need this to continue as a vibrant community and we need this be economically viable in the future.
We also scheduled a Public Hearing for July 14th to discuss TIF district. I will have much more to say about how this TIF is structured and how it works in the coming month.
I have spoken at length lately about the merits of commercial development, how a rebate TIF is a best way to make sure this project succeeds, and why this project is good for our town. Tonight it is time for me to go back and reflect on what started me on this path 6 years ago.
When I first ran for council in November 2009 I spoke at length about our city budget and my concern over it. The fiscal year that had ended in June 2009 had a $39K annual deficit. I had spoken in favor of the proposed development as a citizen who saw walkable commercial as important to maintaining our town's quality of life. The more I studied the situation the more I realized that the economic impact was critical as well.
Even though the development has not progressed, we as a city received a reprieve in the form of the Local Option Sales Tax (LOST) that was collected in Johnson County from July 2009 through June 2013. We received roughly the equivalent of a 10% increase for those four years. We managed to bank quite a bit of those proceeds, even though our annual carryover was always smaller than the amount of LOST received. In conversations with Finance chair Jim Lane and City accountant Steve Kuhl 100% of the City's current carryover is attributable to LOST.
It is time to move this project forward. We need this to continue as a vibrant community and we need this be economically viable in the future.
We also scheduled a Public Hearing for July 14th to discuss TIF district. I will have much more to say about how this TIF is structured and how it works in the coming month.
Labels:
2015 City Council,
One University Place,
PUD
Wednesday, April 29, 2015
A Closer Look at TIF
Council held a work session last night on Tax Increment Financing (TIF) as we continue to consider the One University Place project. We had two speakers talk with us, and it was a very informative and illuminating meeting.
The first presenter was Dr. Peter Fisher, Research Director of the Iowa Policy Project. Peter is national expert on public finance and is a frequently cited commentator on what is viewed as the abuse of TIF projects.
I spent a good deal of time speaking with Dr. Fisher in 2010 when in my first term on city council and the idea of TIF was proposed for One University Place. I find him to be very approachable and gracious with his time and expertise. Last night he had a PowerPoint presentation that he shared with the council and public who attended the meeting.
The slideshow can be downloaded from the U-H Municipal website: TIF Presentation
The portion I found most helpful were the last two slides he shared. The first slide was guidelines for Responsible TIF Use:
These are the questions we should apply to One University Place, some I can answer now, others not yet:
Question One: YES ( we are only considering a rebate TIF, for the project site only)
Question Two: YES (I view the commercial space as a public benefit. The developer has said they could build a residential only project without TIF. I believe the public benefit of commercial space justifies a TIF)
Question Three: Not Yet (I'll talk about this down below)
Question Four: To ensure public benefit (This can be explained in my answer to question 2 as well as my firm belief that this property, which currently generates zero taxes, should be on the city rolls. If this development does not take place there is a high probability that it could be purchased by the University of Iowa, which would effectively remove any possibility of it generating taxes)
The second speaker was Tom Jackson of the National Development Council. City Council has hired Tom evaluate the One University Place project and recommend whether or not a TIF would be necessary. Tom has also performed this duty for the City of Iowa City as they consider re-development projects. Tom's work will heavily influence how I judge the answer to question 3 above.
Tom said he will have a full written report delivered to the City prior to our May 27th Public Hearing on the One University Place Planned Unit Development (PUD). He did have some preliminary remarks last night. Here are what I considered major points of what he said last night:
I spent a good deal of time speaking with Dr. Fisher in 2010 when in my first term on city council and the idea of TIF was proposed for One University Place. I find him to be very approachable and gracious with his time and expertise. Last night he had a PowerPoint presentation that he shared with the council and public who attended the meeting.
The slideshow can be downloaded from the U-H Municipal website: TIF Presentation
The portion I found most helpful were the last two slides he shared. The first slide was guidelines for Responsible TIF Use:
These guidelines generally correspond with what I've said I would support in a TIF: a project based, rebate TIF with a definite time/cost ending. The only area above that I haven't supported is the last one in that I have mentioned TIF as a means to pay for the Community Center which would be a tax exempt facility. I will now need to consider bonding for a center in light of Dr. Fisher's suggestions.
The last slide was Questions to Ask:
These are the questions we should apply to One University Place, some I can answer now, others not yet:
Question One: YES ( we are only considering a rebate TIF, for the project site only)
Question Two: YES (I view the commercial space as a public benefit. The developer has said they could build a residential only project without TIF. I believe the public benefit of commercial space justifies a TIF)
Question Three: Not Yet (I'll talk about this down below)
Question Four: To ensure public benefit (This can be explained in my answer to question 2 as well as my firm belief that this property, which currently generates zero taxes, should be on the city rolls. If this development does not take place there is a high probability that it could be purchased by the University of Iowa, which would effectively remove any possibility of it generating taxes)
The second speaker was Tom Jackson of the National Development Council. City Council has hired Tom evaluate the One University Place project and recommend whether or not a TIF would be necessary. Tom has also performed this duty for the City of Iowa City as they consider re-development projects. Tom's work will heavily influence how I judge the answer to question 3 above.
Tom said he will have a full written report delivered to the City prior to our May 27th Public Hearing on the One University Place Planned Unit Development (PUD). He did have some preliminary remarks last night. Here are what I considered major points of what he said last night:
- While Tom didn't say outright that the project deserves a TIF, he did talk in general terms about amounts and time limits, so I am assuming he has deemed the project as viable and worthy of TIF
- Financing model is predicting an 8% return on the project
- Local bank financing would be approximately 5% which would be paid first
- Private equity firms are not interested in projects generating under 15% return
- A TIF time limit of 12 years is the rough projection
- The payment would be a flat amount per year, so that after the first several years of payment, any excess amount generated from site would flow through normal channels to all other entities: county, city, school district
- A gap amount of $4 million is the rough projection
As I said at the beginning of this post, I found last night to be extremely helpful and what I learned will certainly influence and clarify my judgement regarding this project.
Labels:
2015 City Council,
community,
Finances,
One University Place,
PUD,
St. Andrew,
TIF
Friday, March 13, 2015
March Council Meeting Summary

Fellow U-Heights
residents,
City Council held
their regular March meeting Tuesday night, below are some highlights. For more
information please look at the full agenda and attachments.
One University
Place Ordinance First Approval
Following a
recommendation from the Zoning Commission last week, city council held a public
hearing on a zoning amendment for One University Place and heard
community comment. Council also heard from the developers regarding their
request to increase the residential unit number from 80 to 104 and
surface parking from 55 to 108. Their plans show a reduction in commercial
space and the footprint of the front building. The back building would
remain 5 stories. Due to a petition filed by 20% of residents within 300 feet
of the property, council approval would require a super majority of 4 yes
votes. Council approved the first reading tonight 5-0. A second reading of the
amendment will be held at the April meeting.
FY16 Budget
Approved.
Following a
public hearing council approved the FY16 budget. City budget years begin on
July 1. The carryover projected at the end of FY16 is $779. The re-estimated
carryover for the end of FY15 (June 30, 2015) is $13,665.
Parking Passes
Created
Police Chief Ken
Stanley announced a policy where any resident hosting a gathering can contact
the police department and request parking passes for guests who may be leaving
their car on a city street overnight. He also passed out several passes to each
council member for them to distribute to any neighbors if needed.
Upcoming Events
- City Council Work Session on Tax Increment Financing MONDAY MARCH 23, 6:30 pm (tentative)
- City Council Meeting TUESDAY APRIL 14 7:00 PM
- Annual Spring Clean Up Day is SATURDAY APRIL 25th 9-noon
- Arbor Day Tree Planting Ceremony will be SUNDAY APRIL 26th
- Farmer's Market starts TUESDAY JUNE 2nd
- City-Wide Garage Sale will be SATURDAY JUNE 6th throughout town
- RAGBRAI comes through U-Heights! SATURDAY July 25th
- Follow University Heights on Twitter
Consider contributing to the University Heights Community Fund
I also write a blog covering U-H and other timely topics, with my opinions expressed UHForward.blogspot.com
Join the community at Nextdoor University Heights!
As always it is a pleasure to serve as your city councilor.-Mike
Labels:
2015 City Council,
Celebration,
community,
Finances,
One University Place,
Zoning
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)



