My Vote on One University Place

I voted in favor of the PUD and the Developer's Agreement at our June City Council meeting tonight. Neither decision was taken lightly nor without considering the many details of both documents. I also considered how those documents work in light of the request for TIF that the developer has made.

I have spoken at length lately about the merits of commercial development, how a rebate TIF is a best way to make sure this project succeeds, and why this project is good for our town. Tonight it is time for me to go back and reflect on what started me on this path 6 years ago.

When I first ran for council in November 2009 I spoke at length about our city budget and my concern over it. The fiscal year that had ended in June 2009 had a $39K annual deficit. I had spoken in favor of the proposed development as a citizen who saw walkable commercial as important to maintaining our town's quality of life. The more I studied the situation the more I realized that the economic impact was critical as well.

Even though the development has not progressed, we as a city received a reprieve in the form of the Local Option Sales Tax (LOST) that was collected in Johnson County from July 2009 through June 2013. We received roughly the equivalent of a 10% increase for those four years. We managed to bank quite a bit of those proceeds, even though our annual carryover was always smaller than the amount of LOST received.  In conversations with Finance chair Jim Lane and City accountant Steve Kuhl 100% of the City's current carryover is attributable to LOST.

It is time to move this project forward. We need this to continue as a vibrant community and we need this be economically viable in the future.

We also scheduled a Public Hearing for July 14th to discuss TIF district. I will have much more to say about how this TIF is structured and how it works in the coming month.