Email Us!

Have a question you'd like addressed? Send it to mikehaverkamp1960@gmail.com

Wednesday, April 15, 2015

TIF Talk

City council will continue discussing Tax Increment Financing (TIF) at a work session on Tuesday April 28th. We held an informational session on TIF last month. Here is a link to the official minutes of the meeting as posted at the City of University Heights website:

http://university-heights.org/council/15/minutes/150323minutes.pdf

I recommend reading these. I also took notes at the meeting, here is what I recorded:



1. Explain difference doing TIF funding as opposed to doing a municipal bond to provide funding for a development.

Difference between fronting cash or a TIF rebate arrangement. When city has to front, they have to borrow, and puts city’s credit at risk. TIF rebate requires developer to front cash, and then offers future economic benefits, keeps risk on private side. Iowa law allows cities to define “necessary.” That includes infrastructure low-moderate housing.

2. What are the different types of TIF funding- Bond, tax rebate, tax abatement, et.al

Basic tenet: tool to repay obligations to a city or county of urban renewal projects. Has to have a public obligation. 1. Traditional banking (borrowing or a bond) general obligation can be paid by debt obligation levy. 2. Internal borrowing must have your own funds. 3. Negotiated TIF contracts or rebate agreements. 4. Statutory obligation for low income if you TIF market rate projects. One more tool “tax abatement” not a TIF. Keeps new valuations from going on the property tax roll.

3. What is a TIF district and who decides the location of the TIF district?

Location is defined by City Council and BOS have authority to establish urban renewal areas. TIF district is designated by ordinance.

4. Our town has a bonding capacity of about $5.3 million. How is our bonding capacity affected by the different types of TIF funding or a municipal bond?

Law sets debt limit. Interest is not legal debt. Utility borrowing, special assessments not considered debt. GO and TIF are debt. Annual Appropriations make it such that city’s payment liabilities are dependent on city council decisions and action. You can put specific concrete benchmarks to incentivize developers.

5. If TIF funding or a municipal bond is chosen as a gap funding mechanism, who determines how the repayment is used and where it goes. E.g. Johnson County, School District, University Heights.

All decisions are made by city council. Can’t control whether or not revenue comes in and the pace. Minimum assessment agreement establishes a floor of valuation with assessor. Makes TIF revenue stream more predictable.

6. How is University Heights' bonding capacity affected as new buildings are added to the tax rolls and a portion of the TIF or bond is repaid?

As buildings are added debt limits goes up 5% of assessed valuation of new construction. Have to wait for assessment to catch up. 18 month lag. Bond rating of city won’t be an issue.

7. Are there any employment requirements for any TIF funding or bonding?

Required? No but cities could say that if jobs are created in commercial projects the TIF could be higher. 

8. What are the circumstances in which TIF could go totally wrong and result in "bankrupting the city" that we hear from some individuals?

TIF negotiated contract shouldn’t ever hurt a city, since it isn’t the public credit put at risk. However fronting cash is risky but with debt limits and savvy lenders it shouldn’t be an issue either.

9. When does Affordable Housing come into effect for TIF projects?

Lower and moderate income set aside if used for public infrastructure related to new market rate housing then must have additional funding for low/moderate income. Amount is county specific due to rates. In negotiated contract that developer gets percentage after LMI (low moderate income) is first required. TIF for commercial does not require set aside.

What triggers that obligation (TIF used in residential project or for residential purposes, I believe);
How much funding is involved (how is the obligation computed); and
How is the obligation paid – over time, as TIF is rebated, etc.

Questions from audience

When should city not use TIF?

Each community has to make that decision about what is appropriate use and when.

Any implications for public space not subject to taxation?

2012 leg says analysis has to be done to find feasibility. Keeps discretion at local level.
In determining increment on tax exempt property how is increment measured?
County assessor starts from zero when counting in similar projects but must involve assessor to know for sure.

Coralville’s Bond Rating drops 6 levels in 2 years What about U-H? What about local banks not wanting to loan to us?  

Doesn’t work for a rating agency and has a hard time considering how we might need a bond rating agency. Are you making a good policy decision and a good fiscal decision?  Banks generally will enter with municipalities. 

20 year TIF collection limit under current law. For market rate housing TIF limit is 11 years.




 



Friday, March 13, 2015

March Council Meeting Summary


 
Fellow U-Heights residents,



City Council held their regular March meeting Tuesday night, below are some highlights. For more information please look at the full agenda and attachments


One University Place Ordinance First Approval

Following a recommendation from the Zoning Commission last week, city council held a public hearing on a zoning amendment for One University Place  and heard community comment. Council also heard from the developers regarding their request to increase the residential unit number from 80  to 104 and surface parking from 55 to 108. Their plans show a reduction in commercial space and the footprint of the front building. The back building would remain 5 stories. Due to a petition filed by 20% of residents within 300 feet of the property, council approval would require a super majority of 4 yes votes. Council approved the first reading tonight 5-0. A second reading of the amendment will be held at the April meeting. 


FY16 Budget Approved.

Following a public hearing council approved the FY16 budget. City budget years begin on July 1. The carryover projected at the end of FY16 is $779. The re-estimated carryover for the end of FY15 (June 30, 2015) is $13,665.


Parking Passes Created

Police Chief Ken Stanley announced a policy where any resident hosting a gathering can contact the police department and request parking passes for guests who may be leaving their car on a city street overnight. He also passed out several passes to each council member for them to distribute to any neighbors if needed.



Upcoming Events

  • City Council Work Session on Tax Increment Financing MONDAY MARCH 23, 6:30 pm (tentative) 
  • City Council Meeting TUESDAY APRIL 14 7:00 PM 
  • Annual Spring Clean Up Day is SATURDAY APRIL 25th 9-noon 
  • Arbor Day Tree Planting Ceremony will be SUNDAY APRIL 26th 
  • Farmer's Market starts TUESDAY JUNE 2nd
  • City-Wide Garage Sale will be SATURDAY JUNE 6th throughout town 
  • RAGBRAI comes through U-Heights! SATURDAY July 25th

Wednesday, March 11, 2015

HF 161

An almost overlooked issue at last night's city council meeting was the announcement of the passage of  HF161, a bill in the Iowa House of Representatives that would eliminate the ability of cities to limit occupancy of homes based on family status. Most of U-Heights is zoned single family meaning a family of related individuals, regardless of size, may live in a house. By our zoning definition, however, no more than two unrelated adults comprise a family. As our city attorney observed last night, this is the bedrock of all of our zoning and housing regulations. I wrote about this two years ago when the same bill was in the Iowa House HF184 Do Something?


Check this story in this morning's Press Citizen for details.

Bill would end some single-home roommate restrictions


I would urge all of you to consider writing to our senators to express your feelings on this topic. A similar bill SF458 has the important difference of NOT eliminating the non-related standard for zoning. Here is information I shared with people at the council meeting last night:

Local Senators
joe@joebolkcom.org                   Johnson
robert.dvorsky@legis.iowa.gov     Johnson
Kevin.Kinney@legis.iowa.gov        Johnson/Washington
rob.hogg@legis.iowa.gov             Linn
liz.mathis@legis.iowa.gov             Linn
wally.horn@legis.iowa.gov           Linn

Ask senators to oppose SSB1218, or SF458 or similar bills to HF161. The key is not to limit the ability of cities to restrict, via zoning, the number of unrelated adults that can occupy a property.

Points to mention: As a community of small homes (2 bedrooms, many under 1600 square feet) and narrow streets we would simply not be able to accommodate the amount of pressure this would put on our town. Street storage of autos, problems with garbage collection, and general wear on property are all problems exacerbated by increasing the number of adults living in a single property.

Other senators

Majority leader         mike.gronstal@legis.iowa.gov
Assistant Majority Leader:    bill.dotzler@legis.iowa.gov
Assistant Majority Leader:    matt.mccoy@legis.iowa.gov
Assistant Majority Leader:    amanda.ragan@legis.iowa.gov
Assistant Majority Leader:    mary.jo.wilhelm@legis.iowa.gov
Republican Leader:    bill.dix@legis.iowa.gov
Republican Whip:      jack.whitver@legis.iowa.gov
Assistant Republican Leader: rick.bertrand@legis.iowa.gov
Assistant Republican Leader: randy.feenstra@legis.iowa.gov
Assistant Republican Leader: tim.kapucian@legis.iowa.gov
Assistant Republican Leader: charles.schneider@legis.iowa.gov
Assistant Republican Leader: dan.zumbach@legis.iowa.gov

Find all Iowa Senators:

Saturday, February 14, 2015

Housing Costs, Density and You

I don't think its an overstatement to say that the One University Place development project has always been on my mind for 6 years. It is the single issue that has occupied a majority of time in my 3 terms on city council. 

This past week council voted to refer to the Zoning Commission the developer's latest request to increase the
number of residential units and parking spaces allowed for the project. The size of the buildings remains the same however so that there will be smaller units created. This has understandably raised concern among our citizens some of whom have voiced that at our meeting, others who have contacted me directly. I wrote last month about some of my thoughts regarding this latest proposal.

It is impossible to also consider our project without looking at housing costs. On January 19th City Council held an affordable housing work session. I asked about "workforce housing" options at that meeting. Median household income in U-Heights has declined from $67,430 in 2000 to $59,018 in 2012, similar declines are found throughout Johnson County. Our median household income is the highest in the county. The county-wide median in 2012 was $53,993. I always benchmark these against what a first year teacher with a BA degree makes in the Iowa City Community School District. In 2014-15 that is $39,200.

While median income was dropping median household value was increasing from $216,100 to $246,800 in the same time period. By definition a person is considered "cost burdened" if they pay more than 30% of their income in housing costs. After adjusting for inflation housing costs in U-Heights have increased 14.2% from 2000 to 2012. At the same time, again adjusted for inflation, incomes have decreased 12.5%. More home owners are now considered cost burdened than in 2000. So the most important figures to me are these: 
  • 20% of U-H home owners pay more than 30% of their income in housing in 2012
    Up from 16% in 2000
  • 50% of U-H renters pay more than 30% of their income in housing in 2012
    Up from 29.3% in 2000
This and much more useful information can be found at the Housing Trust Fund of Johnson County's website. This data above came from their Update to the 2007 Affordable Housing Market Analysis for the Iowa City Urbanized Area (published September 2014).

Given these concerns about affordable housing, I proposed at at our work session and later in a private meeting with the developer that if the City should consider an increase in the number of proposed residential units only IF 5% (6 units) were specifically marked for workforce housing.

I also continue to read and hear national stories that become filtered through my "local lens" to consider their impact here in U-Heights. Here are three that I've run across this week, that I found interesting:

Small Homes Make Better Cities
This article looks at several projects around the country (I'd already heard of the "apodments" but the others were new to me.) At 350 sq. ft. these units are half the size of the smaller units proposed for the front building. 

Walking: The Secret Ingredient for Health, Wealth, and More Exciting Neighborhoods
It's no secret one reason I've pushed for a mixed use development with commercial property is we need somewhere for people to walk to!

With Porches And Parks, A Texas Community Aims For Urban Utopia
Our older portions of town already have this and we have continued to build community among our citizens, our location near the UIHC will always make us attractive, but we do need continue to think about what else can we do to enhance our community. See also the next day's follow up regarding racial tensions in this community.


So those are a few more of my thoughts, I'm always interested in hearing other people's feedback.





Wednesday, February 11, 2015

February Council Meeting Summary

Fellow U-Heights residents,

City Council held their regular February meeting Tuesday night, below are some highlights. For more information please look at the full agenda and attachments.

Curbside Composting Announced

Look for more information soon about a curbside composting program being added to regular Tuesday garbage and recycling collection. Red composting bins will be available for a refundable $25 deposit. Paper compost bag liners will be available at Fareway grocery. More information will be posted on the city website and put in recycling bins. Progress is also being made for a recycling program at Grandview.

Building/Zoning Ordinance Updates

Citizens commented at a public hearing concerning proposed Ordinance 187Sketches illustrating terms and a diagram of measuring building height were presented. Further revisions will be undertaken.

Request sent to Zoning Commission

A request to change  zoning ordinance 181 submitted for the One University Place project was received. Council asked the Zoning Commission to consider this and report back to council.

Upcoming Events
  • City Council Meeting TUESDAY MARCH 10 7:00 PM
  • Annual Spring Clean Up Day is SATURDAY APRIL 25th 9-noon
  • Arbor Day Tree Planting Ceremony will be SUNDAY APRIL 26th
  • City-Wide Garage Sale will be SATURDAY JUNE 6th throughout town
  • Farmer's Market starts TUESDAY JUNE 2nd
  • RAGBRAI comes through U-Heights! SATURDAY July 25th
Follow University Heights on Twitter
Consider contributing to the University Heights Community Fund