One University Place PUD My Thoughts

In the past week City Councilors received the National Development Council's report analyzing whether a TIF proposal would be warranted for the One University Place project. We also received the latest Developer's Agreement draft document.  Both of these will be helpful as Council holds it's Public Hearing and Special Meeting on Wednesday May 27. This meeting will be at the University Club at 7:00 PM. All citizens are invited to attend and comment.

Here is a link to the Agenda and Attachments for the hearing and the meeting. Also in this document are all the reports submitted to Council covering various aspects of the plan. This packet runs 138 pages, so here is a chronological listing of what's in it:

1. Agenda
2. Attorney report
3. PUD Submission 4/17/15
4. PUD Submission 5/21/15
5. MPOjc report
6. MPOjc traffic report
7. NDC gapfunding report
8. UH Building Inspector report
9. UH City Engineer report
10. Coralville Fire Department report
11. Iowa City Water Division report
12. UH Police Department report
13. University of Iowa report
14. Development team responses to city reports
15. Resolution 15-30
16. Development Agreement revised 5/21
17. Resolution 15-31
18. Resolution 15-32

While I think reading the entire packet is informative, I would especially recommend reading the two documents that I made into links above.

Here are my thoughts: I'm comfortable with the PUD plans as amended in the submission of 5/21/15. I will support Resolution 15-30 with the considerations listed (some of which have been addressed by the developer's response.)

I'm also comfortable with the Developer's Agreement as presented. I will support Resolution 15-31.

I'm also willing to support a rebate TIF as outlined in the NDC gap financing report. What that amounts to is a 10% support level, based on the final value of the project. 

Gap Financing Report

It is fair to say the most anticipated report for next week's PUD public hearing was the gap financing report from the National Development Council. Tom Jackson from NDC has worked with the City and the Development group for over a year. His report came to councilors today and can be found here:

Gap Financing Report

I've had a quick read through it and will need to look more closely again tomorrow. Jackson does recommend that the city allow a $4M rebate TIF to the developer. That represents roughly 10% of the projected tax value of the project.

The PUD Public Hearing will be Wednesday May 27th at 7:00 at the University Club.

All of the reports for this hearing as well as other project information can be found here:

http://university-heights.org/BuildZoneSanit/OUP/15/index.html

I hope to see a good turnout of city residents.

A Closer Look at TIF

Council held a work session last night on Tax Increment Financing (TIF) as we continue to consider the One University Place project. We had two speakers talk with us, and it was a very informative and illuminating meeting.

The first presenter was Dr. Peter Fisher, Research Director of the Iowa Policy Project. Peter is national expert on public finance and is a frequently cited commentator on what is viewed as the abuse of TIF projects.

I spent a good deal of time speaking with Dr. Fisher in 2010 when in my first term on city council and the idea of TIF was proposed for One University Place. I find him to be very approachable and gracious with his time and expertise. Last night he had a PowerPoint presentation that he shared with the council and public who attended the meeting.
The slideshow can be downloaded from the U-H Municipal website:  TIF Presentation

The portion I found most helpful were the last two slides he shared. The first slide was guidelines for Responsible TIF Use:

These guidelines generally correspond with what I've said I would support in a TIF: a project based, rebate TIF with a definite time/cost ending. The only area above that I haven't supported is the last one in that I have mentioned TIF as a means to pay for the Community Center which would be a tax exempt facility. I will now need to consider bonding for a center in light of Dr. Fisher's suggestions.

The last slide was Questions to Ask:

These are the questions we should apply to One University Place, some I can answer now, others not yet:

Question One: YES ( we are only considering a rebate TIF, for the project site only)
Question Two: YES (I view the commercial space as a public benefit. The developer has said they could build a residential only project without TIF. I believe the public benefit of commercial space justifies a TIF)
Question Three: Not Yet (I'll talk about this down below)
Question Four: To ensure public benefit (This can be explained in my answer to question 2 as well as my firm belief that this property, which currently generates zero taxes, should be on the city rolls. If this development does not take place there is a high probability that it could be purchased by the University of Iowa, which would effectively remove any possibility of it generating taxes)

The second speaker was Tom Jackson of the National Development Council. City Council has hired Tom evaluate the One University Place project and recommend whether or not a TIF would be necessary. Tom has also performed this duty for the City of Iowa City as they consider re-development projects. Tom's work will heavily influence how I judge the answer to question 3 above.

Tom said he will have a full written report delivered to the City prior to our May 27th Public Hearing on the One University Place Planned Unit Development (PUD). He did have some preliminary remarks last night. Here are what I considered major points of what he said last night:

• While Tom didn't say outright that the project deserves a TIF, he did talk in general terms about amounts and time limits, so I am assuming he has deemed the project as viable and worthy of TIF
• Financing model is predicting an 8% return on the project 
• Local bank financing would be approximately 5% which would be paid first
• Private equity firms are not interested in projects generating under 15% return
• A TIF time limit of 12 years is the rough projection
• The payment would be a flat amount per year, so that after the first several years of payment, any excess amount generated from site would flow through normal channels to all other entities: county, city, school district
• A gap amount of $4 million is the rough projection

As I said at the beginning of this post, I found last night to be extremely helpful and what I learned will certainly influence and clarify my judgement regarding this project.

TIF Talk

City council will continue discussing Tax Increment Financing (TIF) at a work session on Tuesday April 28th. We held an informational session on TIF last month. Here is a link to the official minutes of the meeting as posted at the City of University Heights website:

http://university-heights.org/council/15/minutes/150323minutes.pdf

I recommend reading these. I also took notes at the meeting, here is what I recorded:

1. Explain difference doing TIF funding as opposed to doing a municipal bond to provide funding for a development.

Difference between fronting cash or a TIF rebate arrangement. When city has to front, they have to borrow, and puts city’s credit at risk. TIF rebate requires developer to front cash, and then offers future economic benefits, keeps risk on private side. Iowa law allows cities to define “necessary.” That includes infrastructure low-moderate housing.

2. What are the different types of TIF funding- Bond, tax rebate, tax abatement, et.al

Basic tenet: tool to repay obligations to a city or county of urban renewal projects. Has to have a public obligation. 1. Traditional banking (borrowing or a bond) general obligation can be paid by debt obligation levy. 2. Internal borrowing must have your own funds. 3. Negotiated TIF contracts or rebate agreements. 4. Statutory obligation for low income if you TIF market rate projects. One more tool “tax abatement” not a TIF. Keeps new valuations from going on the property tax roll.

3. What is a TIF district and who decides the location of the TIF district?

Location is defined by City Council and BOS have authority to establish urban renewal areas. TIF district is designated by ordinance.

4. Our town has a bonding capacity of about $5.3 million. How is our bonding capacity affected by the different types of TIF funding or a municipal bond?

Law sets debt limit. Interest is not legal debt. Utility borrowing, special assessments not considered debt. GO and TIF are debt. Annual Appropriations make it such that city’s payment liabilities are dependent on city council decisions and action. You can put specific concrete benchmarks to incentivize developers.

5. If TIF funding or a municipal bond is chosen as a gap funding mechanism, who determines how the repayment is used and where it goes. E.g. Johnson County, School District, University Heights.

All decisions are made by city council. Can’t control whether or not revenue comes in and the pace. Minimum assessment agreement establishes a floor of valuation with assessor. Makes TIF revenue stream more predictable.

6. How is University Heights' bonding capacity affected as new buildings are added to the tax rolls and a portion of the TIF or bond is repaid?

As buildings are added debt limits goes up 5% of assessed valuation of new construction. Have to wait for assessment to catch up. 18 month lag. Bond rating of city won’t be an issue.

7. Are there any employment requirements for any TIF funding or bonding?

Required? No but cities could say that if jobs are created in commercial projects the TIF could be higher. 

8. What are the circumstances in which TIF could go totally wrong and result in "bankrupting the city" that we hear from some individuals?

TIF negotiated contract shouldn’t ever hurt a city, since it isn’t the public credit put at risk. However fronting cash is risky but with debt limits and savvy lenders it shouldn’t be an issue either.

9. When does Affordable Housing come into effect for TIF projects?

Lower and moderate income set aside if used for public infrastructure related to new market rate housing then must have additional funding for low/moderate income. Amount is county specific due to rates. In negotiated contract that developer gets percentage after LMI (low moderate income) is first required. TIF for commercial does not require set aside.

What triggers that obligation (TIF used in residential project or for residential purposes, I believe);

How much funding is involved (how is the obligation computed); and

How is the obligation paid – over time, as TIF is rebated, etc.

Questions from audience

When should city not use TIF?

Each community has to make that decision about what is appropriate use and when.

Any implications for public space not subject to taxation?

2012 leg says analysis has to be done to find feasibility. Keeps discretion at local level.

In determining increment on tax exempt property how is increment measured?

County assessor starts from zero when counting in similar projects but must involve assessor to know for sure.

Coralville’s Bond Rating drops 6 levels in 2 years What about U-H? What about local banks not wanting to loan to us?  

Doesn’t work for a rating agency and has a hard time considering how we might need a bond rating agency. Are you making a good policy decision and a good fiscal decision?  Banks generally will enter with municipalities. 

20 year TIF collection limit under current law. For market rate housing TIF limit is 11 years.

 

March Council Meeting Summary

 

Fellow U-Heights residents,

City Council held their regular March meeting Tuesday night, below are some highlights. For more information please look at the full agenda and attachments. 

One University Place Ordinance First Approval

Following a recommendation from the Zoning Commission last week, city council held a public hearing on a zoning amendment for One University Place  and heard community comment. Council also heard from the developers regarding their request to increase the residential unit number from 80  to 104 and surface parking from 55 to 108. Their plans show a reduction in commercial space and the footprint of the front building. The back building would remain 5 stories. Due to a petition filed by 20% of residents within 300 feet of the property, council approval would require a super majority of 4 yes votes. Council approved the first reading tonight 5-0. A second reading of the amendment will be held at the April meeting. 

FY16 Budget Approved.

Following a public hearing council approved the FY16 budget. City budget years begin on July 1. The carryover projected at the end of FY16 is $779. The re-estimated carryover for the end of FY15 (June 30, 2015) is $13,665.

Parking Passes Created

Police Chief Ken Stanley announced a policy where any resident hosting a gathering can contact the police department and request parking passes for guests who may be leaving their car on a city street overnight. He also passed out several passes to each council member for them to distribute to any neighbors if needed.

Upcoming Events

• City Council Work Session on Tax Increment Financing MONDAY MARCH 23, 6:30 pm (tentative) 
• City Council Meeting TUESDAY APRIL 14 7:00 PM 
• Annual Spring Clean Up Day is SATURDAY APRIL 25th 9-noon 
• Arbor Day Tree Planting Ceremony will be SUNDAY APRIL 26th 
• Farmer's Market starts TUESDAY JUNE 2nd
• City-Wide Garage Sale will be SATURDAY JUNE 6th throughout town 
• RAGBRAI comes through U-Heights! SATURDAY July 25th

• Follow University Heights on Twitter
  Consider contributing to the University Heights Community Fund
  I also write a blog covering U-H and other timely topics, with my opinions expressed UHForward.blogspot.com
  Join the community at Nextdoor University Heights!
  
  As always it is a pleasure to serve as your city councilor.

  -Mike