(photo courtesy iowahouse.org)
Most of U-Heights is zoned R-1 single family. Our zoning codes says that in R-1 zones a family is people related by blood or marriage, or up to 2 UNRELATED adults. So an R-1 home could have:
- a parent or two plus 5 children
- 2 parents a grandparent and a child
- two brothers and a roommate
- 2 roommates.
The bill would eliminate all of this and the only limits on occupancy would probably be related to the size of the lot or structure.
If you agree that this would be bad for town I'd urge you to contact members of the Iowa House ASAP it is possible that the bill will be debated on the floor as early as 3/13/2013.
Here is the link to House members by county with their email addresses:
The Iowa League of Cities also opposes this bill. Here is what they had to say:
Action Step: Please contact your Representatives today to oppose HF184, using the League’s talking points to highlight home rule and the purpose of these ordinances. The main supporters of the bill, the landlords, are arguing that this is a property rights issue for landlords who own the rental property. You should stress this is also a property rights issue for the neighbor who bought their property with the expectation of living in a single family neighborhood--not next to rental properties with many renters who can cause congestion and other issues and disturb the character of their neighborhoods.
Here is some sample language I sent to several House members:
Dear
Representative XXXX,
As
a city councilor for University Heights, a small town of 1,000 adjacent
to
the University of Iowa, I would urge you to oppose HF184. This bill
would
be very detrimental to our town's well being.
We
have a significant number of rental properties in town and we work had
to
welcome new residents. We know from experience that many of our long
term
citizens first lived in U-Heights as students, loved that experience,
and
return to us later in life. However, by not allowing communities to
establish
zoning regulations for the benefit of our citizens we will face
a
situation where the density of residents would overwhelm our narrow
streets
and small infrastructure.
Ninety
percent of our homes were constructed before 1970, 57% were built
before
1960. Many homes are small bungalows or mid-century modern ranch
homes
of less than 1,500 square feet. Allowing us to regulate the number
of
unrelated adults per household is the simplest way for a very small
community
to preserve its quality of life and provide benefits for every
citizen.
Please
consider everyone's rights and vote no on HF 184
-Mike
Haverkamp
University Heights
I don't see any sense in using landlords and property managers to discriminate against potential renters.
ReplyDeleteIt's unethical- the family composition of a household isn't the business of the landlord or the neighbors or the city.
It doesn't work- if your concern is noise, or congestion, or any of the other issue then let's craft legislation to address those issues. In many cases such laws already exist. And in all such cases discrimination doesn't help.
For some cities to demand that landlords discriminate against certain family compositions is downright unAmerican, and is bad policy on top of that.